APFM 23-24
Teachers 1 semester
| Group | 201 | 202 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | [Runjie Geng | |||||
| Workshop Instructor | 201 Salkovsky Ivan Aleksandrovich |
202 Salkovsky Ivan Aleksandrovich | ||||
Grading system
Homework - modules 1-2 0.2
Amount of controls: 8
Period: 1st module 2023/2024, 2nd module 2023/2024, Study period, Offline
Grade: 2nd module 2023/2024
Description: Home assignments are solved individually.
Criteria for evaluation: The grade is determined based on student's individual work, correctness of methods, completeness of the answer and quality of explanations. Unexplained answers w/o derivations/calculations/explanations are not accepted.
If plagiarism is detected, the assessment element will be assigned a score of "0". If the student is suspected of preparing the task not on his own, the teacher has the right to initiate additional verification or defense of this particular assessment element. Then such any assessment element will be graded based on the additional verification or the defense.
Winter Exam 0.51
Period: 2nd module 2023/2024, Session, Offline
Grade: 2nd module 2023/2024
Is exam
Retake an exam: Possible
Retake principles:
Retakes are organized in accordance with the HSE Interim and Ongoing Assessment Regulations. On the first retake the cumulative course grade is taken into consideration. On the second retake there are following rules: If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade >= 4, then the student receives the sum of these marks, multiplied by their coefficients. If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade < 4, but the 2nd retake grade > 7, then the student is given a 4. If the 2nd retake grade is <7 and the cumulative grade is <4, the student receives a failing grade.
Criteria for evaluation:
The assessment of a paper is based on preponderance rather than a paper meeting each bullet point before it can be awarded a mark. 0-19,99 • Nothing presented or completely incorrect information or answers contain nothing at all of relevance • No evidence of understanding • No competence in core basic techniques of the subject 20-29,99 • Misunderstanding of significant areas of the syllabus • No competence in most of the core basic techniques of the subject 30-39,99 • Little understanding evident • Very limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject 40-46,99 • Some understanding evident, but no original thought or critical analysis or ability to grapple with anything other than very routine questions • Limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject or competence only in a small part of the material 47-53,99 • Some understanding evident, but no ability to grapple with anything other than routine questions • Limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject or competence only in part of the material 54-61,99 • An acceptable demonstration of a basic understanding of and competence in the subject • Some knowledge of, and application of, relevant methods and techniques • A basic range of information and knowledge deployed, with some areas of inaccuracy • Arguments and analysis not fully developed • Evidence of essential reading • Acceptable quality of presentation and structure 62-69,99 • A reasonably good understanding of the subject • Knowledge of, and some application of, relevant methods and techniques • A standard, and largely accurate, range of information and knowledge deployed • May demonstrate ability to grapple with standard problems but limited capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of significant understanding of the subject • Satisfactory quality of presentation, with good structure 70-77,99 • A good understanding of the subject • Competent application of relevant methods and techniques • Wide and accurate range of information and knowledge deployed • Clear argument which may demonstrate some capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of significant understanding of the subject • High quality of presentation and good structure 78-85,99 • A thorough understanding of the subject • Deft application of relevant methods and techniques • Extensive range and consistent accuracy of information and knowledge. • Clear argument which demonstrates a significant capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of deep understanding of the subject and its methods • Evidence of a critical approach to essential reading and an ability to apply this in context with, additionally, some evidence of wider reading • Excellent presentation and structure 86-100 • A deep understanding of the subject • Mastery of relevant methods and techniques • Highly extensive range and consistent accuracy of information and knowledge • Lucid argument which demonstrates an impressive ability to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of deep understanding of the subject and its methods • Evidence of a critical approach to essential reading and an ability to apply this in context with, additionally, some evidence of wider reading • Excellent presentation and structure
If plagiarism is detected, the assessment element will be assigned a score of "0". If the student is suspected of preparing the task not on his own, the teacher has the right to initiate additional verification or defense of this particular assessment element. Then such any assessment element will be graded based on the additional verification or the defense.
Midterm exam 1: In-class assignment 0.29
Period: 2nd module 2023/2024, Study period, Offline
Grade: 2nd module 2023/2024
Criteria for evaluation: The assessment of a paper is based on preponderance rather than a paper meeting each bullet point before it can be awarded a mark. 0-19,99 • Nothing presented or completely incorrect information or answers contain nothing at all of relevance • No evidence of understanding • No competence in core basic techniques of the subject 20-29,99 • Misunderstanding of significant areas of the syllabus • No competence in most of the core basic techniques of the subject 30-39,99 • Little understanding evident • Very limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject 40-46,99 • Some understanding evident, but no original thought or critical analysis or ability to grapple with anything other than very routine questions • Limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject or competence only in a small part of the material 47-53,99 • Some understanding evident, but no ability to grapple with anything other than routine questions • Limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject or competence only in part of the material 54-61,99 • An acceptable demonstration of a basic understanding of and competence in the subject • Some knowledge of, and application of, relevant methods and techniques • A basic range of information and knowledge deployed, with some areas of inaccuracy • Arguments and analysis not fully developed • Evidence of essential reading • Acceptable quality of presentation and structure 62-69,99 • A reasonably good understanding of the subject • Knowledge of, and some application of, relevant methods and techniques • A standard, and largely accurate, range of information and knowledge deployed • May demonstrate ability to grapple with standard problems but limited capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of significant understanding of the subject • Satisfactory quality of presentation, with good structure 70-77,99 • A good understanding of the subject • Competent application of relevant methods and techniques • Wide and accurate range of information and knowledge deployed • Clear argument which may demonstrate some capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of significant understanding of the subject • High quality of presentation and good structure 78-85,99 • A thorough understanding of the subject • Deft application of relevant methods and techniques • Extensive range and consistent accuracy of information and knowledge. • Clear argument which demonstrates a significant capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of deep understanding of the subject and its methods • Evidence of a critical approach to essential reading and an ability to apply this in context with, additionally, some evidence of wider reading • Excellent presentation and structure 86-100 • A deep understanding of the subject • Mastery of relevant methods and techniques • Highly extensive range and consistent accuracy of information and knowledge • Lucid argument which demonstrates an impressive ability to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of deep understanding of the subject and its methods • Evidence of a critical approach to essential reading and an ability to apply this in context with, additionally, some evidence of wider reading • Excellent presentation and structure
If plagiarism is detected, the assessment element will be assigned a score of "0". If the student is suspected of preparing the task not on his own, the teacher has the right to initiate additional verification or defense of this particular assessment element. Then such any assessment element will be graded based on the additional verification or the defense.
Interim assessment (2023/2024 2nd module)
Estimation formula: Homework - modules 1-2 * 0.2 + Winter Exam * 0.51 + Midterm exam 1: In-class assignment * 0.29
Retake principles: Retakes are organized in accordance with the HSE Interim and Ongoing Assessment Regulations. On the first retake the cumulative course grade is taken into consideration. On the second retake there are following rules: If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade >= 4, then the student receives the sum of these marks, multiplied by their coefficients. If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade < 4, but the 2nd retake grade > 7, then the student is given a 4. If the 2nd retake grade is <7 and the cumulative grade is <4, the student receives a failing grade. If plagiarism is detected, any assessment element will be assigned a score of "0". If the student is suspected of preparing the task not on his own, the teacher has the right to initiate additional verification or defense of this particular assessment element. Then such an assessment element will be graded based on the additional verification or the defense.
Homework - module 3 0.31
Period: 3rd module 2023/2024, Study period, Offline
Grade: 3rd module 2023/2024
Description: Home assignments are solved individually.
Retake an exam: Possible
Retake principles:
There is an opportunity to submit an assignment on an additional date in case of absence for a valid excuse (with documentary evidence). Criteria for evaluation: The grade is determined based on student's individual work, correctness of methods, completeness of the answer and quality of explanations. Unexplained answers w/o derivations/calculations/explanations are not accepted. If plagiarism is detected, the assessment element will be assigned a score of "0". If the student is suspected of preparing the task not on his own, the teacher has the right to initiate additional verification or defense of this particular assessment element. Then such any assessment element will be graded based on the additional verification or the defense.
Final Exam 0.69
Period: 3rd module 2023/2024, Session, Offline
Grade: 3rd module 2023/2024
Is exam
Blocks everything
Retake an exam: Possible
Retake principles:
Retakes are organized in accordance with the HSE Interim and Ongoing Assessment Regulations. On the first retake the cumulative course grade is taken into consideration. On the second retake there are following rules: If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade >= 4, then the student receives the sum of these marks, multiplied by their coefficients. If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade < 4, but the 2nd retake grade > 7, then the student is given a 4. If the 2nd retake grade is <7 and the cumulative grade is <4, the student receives a failing grade. Criteria for evaluation: The assessment of a paper is based on preponderance rather than a paper meeting each bullet point before it can be awarded a mark. 0-19,99 • Nothing presented or completely incorrect information or answers contain nothing at all of relevance • No evidence of understanding • No competence in core basic techniques of the subject 20-29,99 • Misunderstanding of significant areas of the syllabus • No competence in most of the core basic techniques of the subject 30-39,99 • Little understanding evident • Very limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject 40-46,99 • Some understanding evident, but no original thought or critical analysis or ability to grapple with anything other than very routine questions • Limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject or competence only in a small part of the material 47-53,99 • Some understanding evident, but no ability to grapple with anything other than routine questions • Limited competence in core basic techniques of the subject or competence only in part of the material 54-61,99 • An acceptable demonstration of a basic understanding of and competence in the subject • Some knowledge of, and application of, relevant methods and techniques • A basic range of information and knowledge deployed, with some areas of inaccuracy • Arguments and analysis not fully developed • Evidence of essential reading • Acceptable quality of presentation and structure 62-69,99 • A reasonably good understanding of the subject • Knowledge of, and some application of, relevant methods and techniques • A standard, and largely accurate, range of information and knowledge deployed • May demonstrate ability to grapple with standard problems but limited capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of significant understanding of the subject • Satisfactory quality of presentation, with good structure 70-77,99 • A good understanding of the subject • Competent application of relevant methods and techniques • Wide and accurate range of information and knowledge deployed • Clear argument which may demonstrate some capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of significant understanding of the subject • High quality of presentation and good structure 78-85,99 • A thorough understanding of the subject • Deft application of relevant methods and techniques • Extensive range and consistent accuracy of information and knowledge. • Clear argument which demonstrates a significant capacity to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of deep understanding of the subject and its methods • Evidence of a critical approach to essential reading and an ability to apply this in context with, additionally, some evidence of wider reading • Excellent presentation and structure 86-100 • A deep understanding of the subject • Mastery of relevant methods and techniques • Highly extensive range and consistent accuracy of information and knowledge • Lucid argument which demonstrates an impressive ability to solve more unusual or demanding questions involving application of deep understanding of the subject and its methods • Evidence of a critical approach to essential reading and an ability to apply this in context with, additionally, some evidence of wider reading • Excellent presentation and structure
Interim assessment (2023/2024 3rd module)
Estimation formula: Homework - module 3 * 0.31 + Final Exam * 0.69
Retake principles: Final exam is blocking.
Retakes are organized in accordance with the HSE Interim and Ongoing Assessment Regulations. On the first retake the cumulative course grade is taken into consideration. On the second retake there are following rules: If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade >= 4, then the student receives the sum of these marks, multiplied by their coefficients. If the cumulative grade + 2nd retake grade < 4, but the 2nd retake grade > 7, then the student is given a 4. If the 2nd retake grade is <7 and the cumulative grade is <4, the student receives a failing grade. If plagiarism is detected, any assessment element will be assigned a score of "0". If the student is suspected of preparing the task not on his own, the teacher has the right to initiate additional verification or defense of this particular assessment element. Then such an assessment element will be graded based on the additional verification or the defense.
Final grade
Estimation formula: 2023/2024 2nd module * 0.4 + 2023/2024 3rd module * 0.6
